Stanford University Press, 1988 - 344 頁
In this highly original work, Pierre Bourdieu turns his attention to the academic world of which he is part and offers a brilliant analysis of modern intellectual culture. The academy is shown to be not just a realm of dialogue and debate, but also a sphere of power in which reputations and careers are made, defended and destroyed.
Employing the distinctive methods for which he has become well known, Bourdieu examines the social background and practical activities of his fellow academics--from Foucault, Derrida, and Lacan to figures who are lesser known but not necessarily less influential. Bourdieu analyzes their social origins and current positions, how much they publish and where they publish it, their institutional connections, media appearances, political involvements and so on.
This enables Bourdieu to construct a map of the intellectual field in France and to analyze the forms of capital and power, the lines of conflict and the patterns of change, which characterize the system of higher education in France today.
Homo Academicus paints a vivid and dynamic picture of French intellectual life today and develops a general approach to the study of modern culture and education. It will be of great interest to students of sociology, education and politics as well as to anyone concerned with the role of intellectuals and higher education today.
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
A BOOK FOR BURNING?
TYPES OF CAPITAL AND FORMS OF POWER
The ordinary professors and the reproduction of the corps
Time and power
The consecrated heretics
Collusion between opponents
Positions and stances
A crisis of succession
A temporal order
able academic according agents agrégation allow analysis appearance appointed arts associated authority body capital career cent classification collective committee constitutes constructed correspondences crisis criteria critical cultural defined director disciplines dispositions doctorate dominant doubt Ecole effect enquiry especially established examination expressed fact faculties Father field France function give hierarchy higher education important indices individual instance institution intellectual Jacques Jean journalists knowledge language least lecturers less limits linked logic lycée medicine Normale objective operation opposition ordinary organized origins Paris person philosophy Pierre political population positions posts practice principles production profession professors properties proportion provinces published pupils question rank relations represented scientific secondary situated social science space specific structure subordinate success symbolic teachers teaching tends transformation understand virtues whole writers