Science Vs. ReligionPolity, 2007年10月8日 - 179 頁 For centuries, science and religion have been portrayed as diametrically opposed. In this provocative new book, Steve Fuller examines the apparent clash between science and religion by focusing on the heated debates about evolution and intelligent design theory. In so doing, he claims that science vs. religion is in fact a false dichotomy. For Fuller, supposedly intellectual disputes, such as those between creationist and evolutionist accounts of life, often disguise other institutionally driven conflicts, such as the struggle between State and Church to be the source of legitimate authority in society. Nowadays many conservative anti-science groups support intelligent design theory, but Fuller argues that the theory's theological roots are much more radical, based on the idea that humans were created to fathom the divine plan, perhaps even complete it. He goes on to examine the unique political circumstances in the United States that make the emergence of intelligent design theory so controversial, yet so persistent. Finally, he considers the long-term prognosis, arguing that the future remains very much undecided as society reopens the question of what it means to be human. This book will appeal to all readers intrigued by the debates about creationism, intelligent design and evolution, especially those looking for an intellectually exciting confrontation with the politics and promise of intelligent design theory. |
內容
Introduction | 1 |
Historical Bases for the Problem | 11 |
Ideological Dimensions of the Problem | 44 |
Complexity as a Conceptual Battleground | 69 |
America as a Legal Battleground | 90 |
Life after Darwinism | 126 |
The Larger Lessons | 159 |
Bibliography | 165 |
Introduction | 1 |
Historical Bases for the Problem | 11 |
Ideological Dimensions of the Problem | 44 |
Complexity as a Conceptual Battleground | 69 |
America as a Legal Battleground | 90 |
Life after Darwinism | 126 |
The Larger Lessons | 159 |
Bibliography | 165 |
其他版本 - 查看全部
常見字詞
20th century animal appear believe biblical biological sciences biology Cambridge Christian common complexity context contrast creation creationist culture Darwin Darwinian Darwinists Dawkins deity Dembski differences Discovery Institute divine plan Dobzhansky E. O. Wilson empirical environment evolutionary evolutionary psychology evolutionists Fuller function Geddes and Branford genes genetics global God’s Gould history of science human Huxley idea ideological inspired intellectual intelligent design theorists Karl Popper Kitzmiller knowledge claims Kuhn Kuhn’s Lamarck Marxism matter Mendel ment metaphysical Michael Behe modern natural selection neo-Darwinian synthesis neo-Darwinism Newton normative organisms Origin of Species Oxford paradigm perhaps philosophers philosophy of science physical political Popper positivists Priestley Priestley’s principle radical reality religious Ruse science and religion science’s scientific inquiry Scientific Revolution scientists secular sense simply social sciences society sociology Stephen Jay Gould supernatural theology Thomas Kuhn tion today’s ultimately University Press William Dembski world-view
