New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction
University of California Press, 1992年2月12日 - 345 頁
Communism, or as Ken Jowitt prefers, Leninism, has attracted, repelled, mystified, and terrified millions for nearly a century. In his brilliant, timely, and controversial study, New World Disorder, Jowitt identifies and interprets the extraordinary character of Leninist regimes, their political corruption, extinction, and highly unsettling legacy.
Earlier attempts to grasp the essence of Leninism have treated the Soviet experience as either a variant of or alien to Western history, an approach that robs Leninism of much of its intriguing novelty. Jowitt instead takes a "polytheist" approach, Weberian in tenor and terms, comparing the Leninist to the liberal experience in the West, rather than assimilating it or alienating it.
Approaching the Leninist phenomenon in these terms and spirit emphasizes how powerful the imperatives set by the West for the rest of the world are as sources of emulation, assimilation, rejection, and adaptation; how unyielding premodern forms of identification, organization, and action are; how novel, powerful, and dangerous charisma as a mode of organized indentity and action can be.
The progression from essay to essay is lucid and coherent. The first six essays reject the fundamental assumptions about social change that inform the work of modernization theorists. Written between 1974 and 1990, they are, we know now, startingly prescient. The last three essays, written in early 1991, are the most controversial: they will be called alarmist, pessimistic, apocalyptic. They challenge the complacent, optimistic, and self-serving belief that the world is being decisively shaped in the image of the West—that the end of history is at hand.
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
action American appear approach argued attempt become behavior bloc boundaries cadres central challenge character charismatic China Chinese Communist conception consolidation continued corruption countries created critical defining definition developmental distinction East Eastern Europe economic effective efforts elements elite emergence emphasis empirical European example existence extinction fact forces formal Gorbachev historical identify identity ideological impersonal important inclusion individual institutional integrity interests issues Khrushchev leaders leadership Leninism Leninist regimes less liberal major mass means Menshevik military mobilization movements noted observation organization organizational orientations particular Party Party's pattern peasant period political culture position practices Press refers regime's relations relationship respects response revolutionary role Romanian rule significant simply social society Soviet Union Stalin status structure suggest task Third World tion traditional transformation United University West Western York