1. OFFICIAL COST ESTIMATE AND ACCEPTANCE (REIMBURSABLE WORK OR SERVICES) 2. Appropriation code, 108. 6. Conditions of acceptance. In response to your inquiry, there is described in item 7 certain work and the estimated cost thereof. The Bureau of the Census is willing to undertake this work subject to the conditions stated on the reverse of this form which are incorporated in this agreement, unless modified in item 7. If you wish us to proceed with the work, please sign the original and green copy and return them with your check or money order made payable to Census, Department of Commerce, (Federal agencies use SF-1080 or SF-1081) unless other financial arrangements are provided in item 7. 7. Description of work, estimate of cost, time for completion, special conditions, and reference to incoming communication. The International Statistical Programs of the Bureau of the Census agrees to provide a senior-level team of Data Processing experts for technical assistance to the Government of Greece in evaluating their plans for the establishment of a centralized data processing facility referred to as the National Computer Center. The estimated cost for providing the services of the senior advisors is estimated at $17,500. This amount is to cover the salary, international travel, per diem and overhead costs for this advisory service. Reference: Dept. of State Telegrams # ATHENS 3296 (June 70) and Previously submitted (Temp. Work Authorities). 13, 883 3, 617 Total___ 1 $17,050 1 An amount of $3,500 has been reserved to meet the reimbursement claim of the National Bureau of Standards, for the short-term advisory services of Mr. Bruce Ramsey and Mrs. Ethel Marden, both of the Center for Computer Sciences and Technology, N.B.S. The amount stated above will be the final charge for the work described, provided agreement is concluded within 90 days of the date of estimate (item 8c). The final charge will be determined by the actual costs incurred. 8. Approved for the Bureau of the Census by: a. Name: b. Title: c. Date: 9. Accepted on behalf of the party a. Name: b. Title: c. Date: *Federal officials must be authorized to obligate funds. 10. Suggested project title: ATHENS GREECE TEAM 11. Distribution of cost estimate and number of new employees required for each division. 12. Initials of persons preparing or reviewing estimate: 13. Budget and Finance Division approval: Hon. SAM J. ERVIN, Jr., THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, April 21, 1972. Chairman, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you for your letter of March 30 requesting information concerning Executive Agreements since World War II in which the Council of International Economic Policy has participated. As you know, the Council on International Economic Policy was only established in January, 1971 as the White House office coordinating policy recommendations to the President in the area of international economic policy. The Council limits itself to the role of coordinating policy recommendations to the President, and is not involved in the operational aspects of foreign economic policy. Thus the Council has neither concluded nor directly participated in the development of any Executive Agreement. I should add that Executive Agreements concluded in connection with the International Trade Agreements Program will be identified by the Department of State and the Office of the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations, the agencies which have operating responsibility for this subject. I hope the above information is responsive to the needs of your Committee. With best regards, DEAR MR. SECRETARY: I enclose a copy of my letter to you of March 30, 1972, in which I requested a list of executive agreements with foreign states entered into by the Department of Defense. The Subcommittee is ready to go to press with the hearings on Executive Agreements which we conducted during April and May; and since we have not received your response, I should like to remind you of my request. It would be extremely helpful to the Subcommittee if we could receive your reply within the next few days. I might mention that we have had an excellent response from the various agencies of the Government, having received, to date, thirty-five replies from the thirty-seven agencies addressed. With all kind wishes, I am Sincerely yours, SAM J. ERVIN, JR., Chairman, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Hon. SAM J. ERVIN, JR., Chairman, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. DEAR Mr. CHAIRMAN: I have your letter of March 30 requesting a list of all Executive Agreements entered into by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with foreign states. Since its inception on December 2, 1970, EPA has not entered into any Executive Agreement with a foreign government. We have had communications with counterpart agencies overseas concerning the exchange of information and documents and the loan of equipment. In such instances we work very closely with the Department of State. Sincerely yours, WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS, Administrator. EXPORT-IMPOrt Bank of THE UNITED STATES, Hon. SAM J. ERVIN, Jr., DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: We have received your letter of March 30, 1972, concerning all executive agreements since World War II. Mr. Kearns is presently out of the country, so I am answering your letter on his behalf. I understand that you have also requested a list of all such executive agreements from the State Department, and we are advised that they are sending you a very comprehensive reply. The Export-Import Bank of the United States, as you know, has participated in some executive agreements but only in conjunction with other agencies of the Executive Branch, primarily the State Department. This Bank has never entered into an executive agreement by itself. We are informed that any participation by Eximbank will be included in the comprehensive reply which you receive from the State Department. Eximbank does not keep any separate records concerning these agreements since all actions it takes are done pursuant to the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 U.S.C. 635). If after you have reviewed the list presented to you from the State Department you have any specific questions about Eximbank, we will be happy to try to answer those questions. Sincerely, J. E. CORETTE, III, General Counsel. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Hon. SAM J. ERVIN, Jr., DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: In response to your letter of March 30, 1972, I am enclosing a list of communications agreements entered into between the United States and other countries. In view of the urgency of your request, certain additional information responsive to your letter is set out in footnotes to the list, and footnote designators have been pencilled in in the left-hand margin. The footnotes are listed below: 1 The Commission was not in attendance at the discussions leading to the agreement, but it was called upon to provide advice and technical guidance. We are unable to cite specific authority for agreements in this category and defer in this respect to the Department of State. 1a The Commission was not in attendance at the discussions leading to the agreement, but it was called upon to provide advice and technical guidance. Authority for these agreements is set out in the International Radio Regulations. ib The Commission was not in attendance at the discussions leading to the agreement, but it was called upon to provide advice and technical guidance. Authority for these agreements is set out in P.L. 88-313, May 28, 1964, 78 Stat. 202. ic The Commission was not in attendance at the discussions leading to the agreement, but it was called upon to provide advice and technical guidance. Authority for these agreements is set out in P.L. 87-795, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 202. 2 The Commission was in attendance at discussions leading to the agreement and drafted, or assisted in drafting, the agreement. We are unable to cite specific authority for agreements in this category and defer in this respect to the Department of State. 3 These agreements are bilateral or multilateral treaties concurred in by the Senate. I trust that the information we are able to furnish will serve your purposes. Sincerely, DEAN BURCH, Chairman. Subject U.S.-U.S.S.R. agreement on organization of commercial radio Teletype com- U.S.-U.K. agreement regarding standardization of distance Measuring equip- London Telecommunications Agreement between the United States and Cer- United States-Ecuador arrangement regarding radio communications between North American Regional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA). Signed at Wash- United States-Canada Convention relating to the operation by citizens of either country of certain radio equipment or stations in the other country. Signed at Ottawa Feb. 8, 1951. Entered into force May 15, 1952. United States-Cuba arrangement regarding radio communications between amateur stations on behalf of third parties. Effected by exchange of notes at Hava ia Sept. 17, 1951, and Feb. 27, 1952. Entered into force Feb. 27, 1952. United States-Cuba agreement concerning the control of electromagnetic radiation. Effected. by exchange of notes at Havana Dec. 10 and 18, 1951. Entered into force Dec. 18, 1951. United States-Canada agreement for the promotion of safety on the great lakes by means of radio. The agerement applies to vessels of all countries as provided for in article 3. Signed at Ottawa Feb. 21, 1952. Entered into force Nov. 13, 1954. United States-Canada agreement relating to the assignment of television London revision (1952) of the London Telecommunications Agreement (1949) United States-Panama agreement regarding radio communications between Telegraph regulations (Geneva rev., 1958). Annexed to the International Subject United States-Mexico arrangment regarding radio communications between amateur stations on behalf of third parties. Effected by exchange of notes at Mexico July 31, 1959. Entered into force Aug. 30, 1959. United States-Honduras agreement regarding radio communications between United States-Venezuela arrangement regarding radio communications between United States-Dominican Republic agreement regarding Radio Communications Partial revision of the radio regulations, Geneva, 1959, final acts of the EARC United States-Brazil agreement regarding radio communications between United States-Canada agreement regarding coordination and use of radio frequencies above 30 Mc/s revising the technical annex to the agreement of Oct. 24, 1962 (TIAS 5205). Effected by exchange of notes at Ottawa June 16 and 24, 1965. Entered into force June 24, 1965. United States-Israel agreement regarding radio communications between amateur stations on behalf of third parties. Effected by exchange of notes at Washington July 7, 1965. Entered into force Aug. 6, 1965. Amendment to article 28 of the IMCO Convention (TIAS 4044). Adopted by the IMCO Assembly at Paris Sept. 28, 1965. Entered into force Nov. 3, 1968. International Telecommunication Convention. Signed at Montreux Nov. 12, 1965. Entered into force with respect to the United States May 29, 1967. United States agreement regarding headquarters of the United Nations supplementing the agreement of June 26, 1947 (TIAS 1676). Signed at New York Feb. 9, 1966. Entered into force Feb. 9, 1966. Amended by the agreement contained in TIAS 6176 signed Dec. 8, 1966. Précis-Verbal of rectification to certain annexes to the International Convention for the safety of life at sea of June 17, 1960 (TIAS 5780). Done at London Feb. 15, 1966. |