...them by virtue of his engagements with the British Government. Inquiry, however, showed that Ghuffoor Khan held them on his own account as a member of Holkar's government, and that his real dependence on Ameer Khan, which was the origin of his influence with...

...by virtue of his engagements with the British Government. But it was proved upon inquiry that Gafiir Khan held them on his own account as a member of Holkar's...before the war of 1817. Amir Khan's claim was therefore rejected.1 Such was the origin of the principality of Jaora — the successful audacity of an adventurer...

...engagements with the British Government. But it was proved upon inquiry that Gafiir Khan held them oil his own account as a member of Holkar's administration,...before the war of 1817. Amir Khan's claim was therefore rejected.1 Such was the origin of the principality of Jaoni — the successful audacity of an adventurer...

...government, and that his real dependence on Amir Khan, which was the origin of his influence with Holkar, had ceased before the war of 1817. Amir Khan's claim was therefore rejected. Ghafur Khan was succeeded in 1825 by his son Ghaus Muhammad Khan, who was then only two years of age....

...government, and that his real dependence on Amir Khan, which was the origin of his influence with Holkar, had ceased before the war of 1817. Amir Khan's claim was therefore rejected. Ghafur Khan was succeeded in 1825 by his son Ghaus Muhammad Khan, who was then only two years of age....

...by virtue of his engagements with the British Government. But it was proved upon inquiry that Gafur Khan held them on his own account as a member of Holkar's...his influence at that court, had ceased before the Avar of 1817. Amir Khan's claim was therefore rejected.1 Such was the origin of the principality of...