Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist EuropeJohns Hopkins University Press, 1996年8月22日 - 504 頁 Since their classic volume The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes was published in 1978, Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan have increasingly focused on the questions of how, in the modern world, nondemocratic regimes can be eroded and democratic regimes crafted. In Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, they break new ground in numerous areas. They reconceptualize the major types of modern nondemocratic regimes and point out for each type the available paths to democratic transition and the tasks of democratic consolidation. They argue that, although "nation-state" and "democracy" often have conflicting logics, multiple and complementary political identities are feasible under a common roof of state-guaranteed rights. They also illustrate how, without an effective state, there can be neither effective citizenship nor successful privatization. Further, they provide criteria and evidence for politicians and scholars alike to distinguish between democratic consolidation and pseudo-democratization, and they present conceptually driven survey data for the fourteen countries studied. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation contains the first systematic comparative analysis of the process of democratic consolidation in southern Europe and the southern cone of South America, and it is the first book to ground post-Communist Europe within the literature of comparative politics and democratic theory. "This is an important volume by two major scholars on a central topic -- one of broad interest to people in comparative politics, to those interested in democracy, and to regional specialists on Southern Latin America and on Central and Eastern Europe. The book will unquestionably be a major contribution to the literature on constructing democratic governance." -- Abraham F. Lowenthal, University of Southern California |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 3 筆結果,共 94 筆
... military - as - institution will come to the decision that the costs of direct involvement in nondemocratic rule are greater than the costs of extrication . Thus , the reassertion of hierarchical au- thority in the name of the military ...
... military softened their de- mands . 10 This is not to imply that the military - as - organization was not able to extract a price ; they were . The fact that a hierarchically controlled military held power until after the first ...
... military surrendered to the British in Malvinas on June 14 , 1982 , the military were not seen as a reliable or competent ally by any major section of Argentine civil or political society and internal military dissension ...
內容
Democracy and Its Arenas | 3 |
Stateness Nationalism and Democratization | 16 |
Transition Paths and Consolidation Tasks | 55 |
著作權所有 | |
10 個其他區段未顯示