 | Brian J. Loasby - 1976 - 266 頁
...have been much less easy to accept was the obvious but unnoticed implication of the statement that 'the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism' (p. 389). If decisions within a firm are explicitly not made by using the price mechanism, might it... | |
 | Oliver E. Williamson, Sidney G. Winter - 1993 - 260 頁
...The existence of such mixed relationships does not mean, for me, that we should abandon the view that "the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism," as I put it in "The Nature of the Firm," or that the distinction between the allocation of resources... | |
 | Jeremy Edwards, Klaus Fischer - 1996 - 274 頁
...mechanism to the market as a means of organising trade originates with Coase (1937), who argued that 'the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism'. However, the profound implications of this view for economic theory - namely, that if the firm is an... | |
 | Peter J. Buckley, Jonathan Michie - 1996 - 498 頁
...mechanism, varies greatly from industry to industry and from firm to firm. lt can, l think, be assumed that the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism. lt is, of course, as Professor Robbins points out, 'related to an outside network of relative prices... | |
 | Louis Putterman, Randy Kroszner - 1996 - 404 頁
...increases in the discretionary power to inter•This contrasts with Coase's view (1937, p. 389) that "the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism" and with the view of Alchian and Demsetz (1972) that a firm is principally a "nexus of contracts."... | |
 | Deirdre N. McCloskey - 1998 - 249 頁
...memorable phrase of Dennis Robertson's, memorable mainly because Coase quoted it so aptly (p. 35). "The distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism" (p. 36). All right: Why supercede it? The answer is the probatio, the proof, given in the long Section... | |
 | Jenny Bourne Wahl - 1998 - 400 頁
...mechaoism, varies greatly from industry to industry and from firm to firm. It can, I think, be assumed that the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechaoism. It is, of course, as Professor Robbins points out, " related to an outside network of relative... | |
 | Brian J. Loasby - 1999 - 370 頁
...decisions to the owners of critical assets. He agrees with Coase (1937, reprinted in Coase 1988:36) that 'the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism', and he consequently takes administrative arrangements far more seriously than do agency and property... | |
 | Nicolai J. Foss - 2000 - 344 頁
...mechanism, varies greatly from industry to industry and from firm to firm. It can, I think, be assumed that the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism. It is, of course, as Professor Robbins points out, "related to an outside network of relative prices... | |
 | Nicolai J. Foss - 2000 - 488 頁
...transfer pricing is also a market of sorts and stands as a modern qualification to Coase's assertion that "the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism."85 Again, as Alchian and Demsetz have noted, "the department store is a firm and is a superior... | |
| |
I think, be assumed that the distinguishing mark of the firm is the supersession of the price mechanism. 
