Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as OntologyCambridge University Press, 2006年10月12日 The agent-structure problem is a much discussed issue in the field of international relations. In his comprehensive 2006 analysis of this problem, Colin Wight deconstructs the accounts of structure and agency embedded within differing IR theories and, on the basis of this analysis, explores the implications of ontology - the metaphysical study of existence and reality. Wight argues that there are many gaps in IR theory that can only be understood by focusing on the ontological differences that construct the theoretical landscape. By integrating the treatment of the agent-structure problem in IR theory with that in social theory, Wight makes a positive contribution to the problem as an issue of concern to the wider human sciences. At the most fundamental level politics is concerned with competing visions of how the world is and how it should be, thus politics is ontology. |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 5 筆結果,共 87 筆
第 14 頁
... issue with any attempt to treat positivism and science as co-extensive terms and to sketch the outlines of a non-positivist theory of science and, mutatis mutandis, a social science not constructed on positivist foundations. In ...
... issue with any attempt to treat positivism and science as co-extensive terms and to sketch the outlines of a non-positivist theory of science and, mutatis mutandis, a social science not constructed on positivist foundations. In ...
第 15 頁
... issue of naturalism. The agent–structure debate in IR highlighted how closely the issue of naturalism is related to the agent–structure problem. In many ways, the agent–structure problem is structured by a series of responses to the ...
... issue of naturalism. The agent–structure debate in IR highlighted how closely the issue of naturalism is related to the agent–structure problem. In many ways, the agent–structure problem is structured by a series of responses to the ...
第 16 頁
... issue of naturalism, whether explicitly acknowledged or not, was a key factor. In the first great debate – between realists and idealists – Carr claimed that the difference between realism and idealism was similar to that between ...
... issue of naturalism, whether explicitly acknowledged or not, was a key factor. In the first great debate – between realists and idealists – Carr claimed that the difference between realism and idealism was similar to that between ...
第 18 頁
... issue with many of the fundamentals of positivism, but it does so out of a sincere commitment to science as a valid practice in terms of knowledge generation, and importantly, one that can be extended to cover the social world. But this ...
... issue with many of the fundamentals of positivism, but it does so out of a sincere commitment to science as a valid practice in terms of knowledge generation, and importantly, one that can be extended to cover the social world. But this ...
第 19 頁
... issue that structures competing philosophies of science. Positivism, in attempting to limit the legitimate ... issues, which then feed into methodological matters. For some versions of positivism, this would be a contentious claim. The ...
... issue that structures competing philosophies of science. Positivism, in attempting to limit the legitimate ... issues, which then feed into methodological matters. For some versions of positivism, this would be a contentious claim. The ...
內容
14 | |
15 | |
23 | |
The habitus intersubjectivity rules places roles duties rights | 50 |
from | 62 |
3 The agentstructure problem in IR | 90 |
reductionist or not? | 91 |
agents or structures | 99 |
Structure as relations of difference that constitute | 131 |
Structure as rules and resources | 137 |
When we scratch the surface of what we are told | 155 |
some final comments | 174 |
5 Agency | 177 |
Agential stories | 180 |
Epistemology | 231 |
the | 243 |
The agentstructure levelsofanalysis and | 102 |
4 Structure | 121 |
two traditions and five models | 123 |
Structure as lawlike regularities that govern | 129 |
Methodology | 257 |
Social causation as an ontologically grounded | 272 |
Methodology and the agentstructure relationship | 279 |
8 Conclusion | 290 |
其他版本 - 查看全部
常見字詞
accept account of structure activity actors agency agent–structure problem agents and structures Alexander Wendt analysis and/or argues argument Ashley attempt behaviour beliefs Bhaskar Carlsnaes causal causal power claim commitment complex concepts conceptualisation constitute context Dessler differing distinction Durkheim effect elements embedded emergent empirical empiricism entities epistemological example exist explain Giddens Hence Hollis and Smith human ical ideas important individualist individuals interactions international relations issue knowledge logical material means mechanisms methodological methodological individualism methodological individualist nature neorealism notion object ontological Onuf organisations particular phenomena philosophical position positivism positivist poststructuralism poststructuralist properties question realist reality reductionism refers reject relationship role rules and resources scientific realism scientists sense simply social action social facts social ontology social relations social sciences social scientific social structures social theory social world society specific struc structural theory structuralist structure as rules suggest theoretical tion understanding Waltz Waltz’s theory Weber Wendt whilst
熱門章節
第 65 頁 - When reference is made in a sociological context to a 'state,' a 'nation,' a 'corporation,' a 'family,' or an 'army corps,' or to similar collectivities, what is meant is, on the contrary, only a certain kind of development of actual or possible social actions of individual persons.
第 133 頁 - Everything that has been said up to this point boils down to this: in language there are only differences. Even more important: a difference generally implies positive terms between which the difference is set up; but in language there are only differences without positive terms.
第 98 頁 - Whenever certain elements combine and thereby produce, by the fact of their combination, new phenomena, it is plain that these new phenomena reside not in the original elements but in the totality formed by their union.
第 134 頁 - The function of this center was not only to orient, balance, and organize the structure - one cannot in fact conceive of an unorganized structure - but above all to make sure that the organizing principle of the structure would limit what we might call the play of the structure.
第 69 頁 - According to the notion of the duality of structure, the structural properties of social systems are both medium and outcome of the practices they recursively organize.
第 66 頁 - Consequently, every time that a social phenomenon is directly explained by a psychological phenomenon, we may be sure that the explanation is false.
第 134 頁 - Nevertheless, up to the event which I wish to mark out and define, structure - or rather the structurality of structure - although it has always been at work, has always been neutralized or reduced, and this by a process of giving it a center or of referring it to a point of presence, a fixed origin.
第 53 頁 - ... conceptions of what they are doing in their activity ; (3) social structures, unlike natural structures, may be only relatively enduring (so that the tendencies they ground may not be universal in the sense of space-time...
第 238 頁 - For there is a massive central core of human thinking which has no history — or none recorded in histories of thought; there are categories and concepts which, in their most fundamental character, change not at all.