What Happened to the Soviet Union?: How and Why American Sovietologists Were Caught by SurpriseBloomsbury Academic, 2002年9月30日 - 248 頁 Xenakis examines the responses of Soviet experts in American academia—primarily political scientists, but also economists and defense scholars who specialized in the USSR—to the unfolding evidence of Soviet reform during the 1970s and 1980s and to its ultimate collapse. He concludes that American Sovietologists and other political scientists were more responsive to the Cold War consensus—to the needs of the State Department, Defense, and CIA policy makers and to the official Washington line of the moment—than to the changing face of the Soviet Union. |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 3 筆結果,共 10 筆
... Army still lagged behind technologically - especially " in areas relevant to strategic nuclear force effectiveness ... armed forces had a number of problems , General Smith noted , in- cluding a " declining manpower pool " ; cultural ...
... forces of inertia and continuity [ to ] remain dominant ” in the years ahead , and he characterized the Soviet Union ... armed forces " in comparison with the armies of the West " —and by " the growing technological gap " between the ...
... armed forces were ethnically " fragmented " and hampered by racial tension , in- sults , and violence , the Sovietologist noted . Although the Red Army was " for- mally the most integrated institution " in the Soviet Union ...
內容
George F Kennan Zbigniew Brzezinski Jerry F Hough | 23 |
Khrushchev | 61 |
Neoconservatism and American | 95 |
著作權所有 | |
4 個其他區段未顯示