What Happened to the Soviet Union?: How and Why American Sovietologists Were Caught by SurpriseBloomsbury Academic, 2002年9月30日 - 248 頁 Xenakis examines the responses of Soviet experts in American academia—primarily political scientists, but also economists and defense scholars who specialized in the USSR—to the unfolding evidence of Soviet reform during the 1970s and 1980s and to its ultimate collapse. He concludes that American Sovietologists and other political scientists were more responsive to the Cold War consensus—to the needs of the State Department, Defense, and CIA policy makers and to the official Washington line of the moment—than to the changing face of the Soviet Union. |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 3 筆結果,共 20 筆
... Production Growth . In the 1960s and early 1970s , most of the CIA's statistical indicators - in energy , min- erals and metals , transportation , manufactured items , and exports — were rising steadily over time and hinted at Soviet ...
... produce growth . Although Soviet industrialization and modernization had " come a long way , " a " very large ... [ production ] at dollar prices [ was ] not final product but intermediate goods and primary resources . " Thus , it ...
... production of military hardware , and it ran “ the mili- tary sector in a flexible and imaginative way . " But military readiness was poor , and Moscow's " ineptitude with computers " was a serious weakness . The Har- vard economist ...
內容
George F Kennan Zbigniew Brzezinski Jerry F Hough | 23 |
Khrushchev | 61 |
Neoconservatism and American | 95 |
著作權所有 | |
4 個其他區段未顯示