 To the Constitution of the United States the term sovereign is totally unknown. There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained...  The Dial - 第 239 頁由 編輯 - 1896完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Christoph Schärtl - 2005 - 324 頁
...194 Amar, 96 Yale LJ 1987, S. 1425 ff., 1456. 195 Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 US 419 ff., 454 (1793, „To the Constitution of the United States the term SOVEREIGN,...themselves 'SOVEREIGN' people of the United States" [Hervorhebungen im Original, Anmerkung des Verfassers]). Amar, 96 Yale LJ 1987, S. 1425 ff, 1456. l%... | |
 | Jean Bethke Elshtain - 2008 - 352 頁
...learn that in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), Supreme Court Justice Wilson uttered the famous words: "To the Constitution of the United States the term sovereign...conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration."48 This "delicate" avoidance of ostentation didn't last very long — although the sovereignty... | |
 | 1830 - 578 頁
...aggregately, may be discovered from his opinion, and particularly in that part, wherein he says, "to the Constitution of the United States, the term SOVEREIGN...fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration." What else could be expected from a Judge on the bench, whose views are so obscured by preconceived... | |
| |
